|
|
|
|
박현애 ( ) - 서울대학교 간호대학
김정은 ( ) - 대불대학교 간호학과
조인숙 ( ) - 서울대학교 간호대학 간호과학연구소
최영희 ( ) - 이화여자대학교 간호대학
이향련 ( ) - 경희대학교 간호학과
김혜숙 ( ) - 경희대학교 간호학과
박현경 ( ) - 대한간호협회
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this study was to develop and test the validity of standardized Korean nomenclature based on Nursing Intervention Classifications (NIC), developed by McCloskey and Bulechek at the University of Iowa.
The four phases of the study were
1. Two professors and 15 graduate students, who were taking a nursing intervention course, translated the 433 nursing interventions of NIC into Korean -,
2. 12 nurses with various clinical backgrounds reviewed the nomenclature, taking into consideration the definition and activities for each Korean nursing intervention. The Delphi method was used to determine the best appropriate nomenclature for each intervention ;
3. 20 academic and clinical experts in nursing were given a questionnaire to rate the validity of each Korean nomenclature using a 5 point Likert scale ranging from very inappropriate to very appropriate ;
4. five members of the Korean Nurses Association Research Committee reviewed the survey results and determined the most appropriate Korean nomenclature for each nursing intervention of NIC system.
Most nomenclature had a score of more than 4.0, but seven nursing interventions had a score lower than 4.0 : Critical Path Development (2.71), Calming Technique (3.41), Grief Work Facilitation (3.44), Order Transcription (3.44), Self Modification Assistance (3.44), and Teaching : Psycho-motor Skills (3.47). These research results will be included in the nursing vocabulary dictionary to be published by Korean Nurses Association.
|
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
NIC, 간호중재분류체계, 간호정보 표준화, NIC, Nursing Intervention Classification Standardization
|
|
|
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
|
|
|
|
|
등재저널 정보
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
|